<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WPUnlimited &#8211; WordPress Theme Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bradleclerc.com/2009/02/wpunlimited-wordpress-theme-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bradleclerc.com/2009/02/wpunlimited-wordpress-theme-review/</link>
	<description>The personal site and rant archive of Brad Leclerc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Leclerc</title>
		<link>http://bradleclerc.com/2009/02/wpunlimited-wordpress-theme-review/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Leclerc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradleclerc.com/?p=77#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I would say that it is worth it if you like being able to change the design/colours/etc very easily, than yes...it&#039;s worth every penny. That&#039;s even more true if you go for the developer license if you&#039;re gonna use it for multiple sites, since it&#039;s massively easy to make them all look VERY different with very little time/effort. If you just want a simple theme that you probably won&#039;t want to mess with much, then it may be a bit of overkill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that it is worth it if you like being able to change the design/colours/etc very easily, than yes&#8230;it&#8217;s worth every penny. That&#8217;s even more true if you go for the developer license if you&#8217;re gonna use it for multiple sites, since it&#8217;s massively easy to make them all look VERY different with very little time/effort. If you just want a simple theme that you probably won&#8217;t want to mess with much, then it may be a bit of overkill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franky</title>
		<link>http://bradleclerc.com/2009/02/wpunlimited-wordpress-theme-review/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Franky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradleclerc.com/?p=77#comment-3</guid>
		<description>so the theme is worth 59$ ?
with all those features and simple design , the theme grabbed my attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the theme is worth 59$ ?<br />
with all those features and simple design , the theme grabbed my attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kemp</title>
		<link>http://bradleclerc.com/2009/02/wpunlimited-wordpress-theme-review/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kemp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bradleclerc.com/?p=77#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Looks like you are using the wpunlim theme - would be useful to declare that.

There are others with endless options like http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/atahualpa which is a bit OTT in my view.

The video spend too much time on trivial changes that are just as fast / easy to edit in a stylesheet.

What I&#039;d be interested in is how much faster it works with integrated  plugins and how that is going to be kept up to date.

After 3 years and many hundreds of plugins and site combinations it is all becoming much more resilient.

There are ways to test the number of calls and optimise.

I see you don&#039;t use the subscribe to comments plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you are using the wpunlim theme &#8211; would be useful to declare that.</p>
<p>There are others with endless options like <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/atahualpa" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/atahualpa</a> which is a bit OTT in my view.</p>
<p>The video spend too much time on trivial changes that are just as fast / easy to edit in a stylesheet.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d be interested in is how much faster it works with integrated  plugins and how that is going to be kept up to date.</p>
<p>After 3 years and many hundreds of plugins and site combinations it is all becoming much more resilient.</p>
<p>There are ways to test the number of calls and optimise.</p>
<p>I see you don&#8217;t use the subscribe to comments plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
